back
1992: The
Arizona Green Party qualified for
statewide ballot status in summer, 1992.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8b6a/b8b6a4788e29b57467acc1dc7da816211fd9178c" alt=""
The criteria for qualification in Arizona is to achieve
a certain number of petition signatures. In 1992, the Arizona Green Party
(AZGP) gathered a sufficient
number of signatures to qualify.
1994: The
Arizona Green Party >failed to retain statewide
ballot status in 1994.
The criteria for retaining ballot status in Arizona is different than that
for qualifying in the first place. To retain ballot status, a party must have
at least 14,500 voters as registered party members. The AZGP failed to reach
that threshold and failed to retain its ballot status.
2000: The
Arizona Green Party qualified for statewide
ballot status in summer, 2000.
The criteria for qualification in
Arizona is to achieve a certain number of petition signatures, based upon
turnout in the state's preceding gubernatorial election. In
2000, the Arizona Green Party (AZGP) gathered a sufficient
number of signatures to qualify.
2000: The
Arizona Green Party >failed
to extend statewide ballot status in in November 2000.
The criteria for extending ballot status in Arizona via a general election
result is to receive at least 5% in a statewide race. Green presidential candidate
Ralph Nader received 2.98%
of the vote, insufficient to extend ballot
status.
2008: The
Arizona Green Party qualified for statewide
ballot status in summer, 2008.
The criteria for
qualification in Arizona is to achieve a certain number of petition
signatures, based upon turnout in the state's preceding gubernatorial
election. In 2008, the AZGP
gathered a sufficient number of signatures to qualify.
2008: The
Arizona Green Party >failed
to extend statewide ballot
status in in November 2008.
The criteria for extending ballot status in Arizona via a general
election result is to receive at least 5% in a statewide race.
Green presidential candidate Cynthia McKinney received 0.15%
of the vote, insufficient to extand ballot status.
The ballot status the AZGP achieved in the summer of 2008 lasted
until November 2009, by which time the AZGP needed to have a number
of registered voters equal to to
two-thirds of 1% to retain its status, which in did not have
at that point, needing 20,773 registered voters and having 4,216.
2010: The
Arizona Green Party qualified for
statewide ballot status in March 2010.
The
criteria for qualification in Arizona is to achieve a certain
number of petition
signatures, based upon turnout in the state's preceding gubernatorial
election. In 2010, that number of petition signatures was 20,449.
On March 11th, the
AZGP turned in
29,015
signatures,
and a sufficient
number
were
valid
to qualify the party for ballot status.
This
followed a February 2010 lawsuit
victory, in which Federal Court Judge
Susan Bolton ruled to prohibit the Arizona Secretary of State
from refusing petitions circulated
by nonresident supporters of the Arizona Green Party. At the
same time, she
restored the March 11 deadline, voiding an earlier
published
February 25 substitute, as Arizona had changed the date for the
primaries in the middle of the election cycle. The lawsuit Green
Party v Bennett, was
originally filed on November 18th, 2009.
back