ForeignPolicy: 3rd Piece of the Puzzle
by John Rensenbrink
Third Piece: the North/South Division
Dear Greens on all shores,
I move on to a third Piece of the
puzzle. The major thesis of the first two Pieces goes something like
this: First, Europe, though still in a state of ultimate dependence on
the U.S., will increasingly seek independence of the over-weening
power and dominating arrogance of the U.S. government. Second, that
European Greens do, and should, applaud and support such a trend, but
without letting it take a strident military (and economically
agressive) form that pits Europe against the U.S. and will inspire the
U.S. government to intensify its quest for domination and control.
Third, that in order for Greens in Europe to be successful in this, it
is essential that Greens in the United States and their allies develop
a political power sufficient to temper (if not transform) the
imperialist and hegemonic drive of the U.S. government as presently
constituted. Thus, it is argued, a combination of Greens in Europe and
Greens in the United States and Canada can help a new policy, a new
kind of leadership, a new direction to emerge that will alter the
present policies that are driving both the U.S. and Europe towards
disaster, and the world along with them.
A large order you may say.
Indeed, but wait until you consider
the next one.
The next one, and it is an even
deeper issue if you can believe it, is the North/South division.
I shall state the problem as briefly
as possible, since most of us know a good deal about its various
disturbing facets.
The fundamental problem is that the
South (and this includes China) has for some time now been deluded
into thinking that the way forward is to imitate and emulate the
development process of the North, the anti-nature techno-industrial
model. The delusion is of course fostered by the multinational
corporations. It is also fostered big time by the so-called aid
institutions of the North (IMF, World Bank, etc etc.) and by the
bureaucrats and experts provided to the South by Northern
governments.But it must also be acknowledged that the elites and
peoples of the South have bought into this delusion to some
considerable degree, just as happened in the North in its period of
taking off from the agrarian economy and society of their past.
The problem is deeply complicated.
For one thing, the populations of the South are for the most part
determined not to live like their grandfathers and mothers, they want
*modernization*, they want consumer goods, they want to have a better
life (since what they have now is abysmal poverty and often grinding
soul-defeating physical and spiritual deprivations together with
horrible environmental pollution that they feel they have to put up
with in order to get out from under the pall of eternal poverty): and
so, they want development and the only one they know about or hear
about is the anti-nature techno-industrial model run on fossil fuels,
the Northern model. For another thing: insofar as the peoples and
(even the) elites of the South would like to stop the pollution, would
like to have clean air, water, land, food, smaller families, insofar
as this is the case, and it is the case in many places, yet they
can't. Two things weigh them down.(A) They are shackled by political
tyranny, straigtjacketed into oppressive social, economic, and
political rigidities (whether this is China, or Brazil,or Iraq or
Singapore), and it is often Northern governments and multinational
corporations that permit and indeed foster such conditions. (B) The
second thing they are shackled by is that they can't afford it. A new
model of development is too expensive. So they are condemned to the
same process the North went (and is going) through and it's much
worse, if that is possible to believe, but believe you me, it may be
even worse than *the dark satanic mills*, than Birmingham or Pittsburg
or even Love Canal.
There is an answer. Oh yes, there
is. It is to be found in the flame of freedom that is not extinguished
anywhere in the world. So that anywhere in the world (North or South,
North and South) human beings there are who will fight for freedom
from tyranny and from the rigidities imposed on people by oppressive
and greedy machines and mafias.
That is one flaming answer. The
second answer lies in the North especially. The North does have the
material and intellectual resources to help provide the South with the
basis for a new developmental beginning rooted in a nature-friendly,
people friendly technology. Not as an act of philanthropy. Not at all.
But as an act of friendliness, cooperation, in recognition of past
unfriendly exploitation and in recognition of our common destiny on
this beautiful planet.
However, not so fast. This must go
hand in hand with a profound shift in the North away from fossil fuels
and away from hyper-consumption habits and patterns. If the North is
to provide real help to the South it must get its own house in order:
it itself must shift away from the old modernization model and towards
an economy and society that is truly in balance with nature.
Well, and how is this to happen, how
is it to happen that real assistance is provided the South, that a new
model of development is offered and fostered, and that the North
itself shifts into a new develomental mode? And how is it to happen
that the South can in turn cooperate and get excited by the new model
and pursue a new developmental pathway?
The answer in both cases, however
much many may still wish to resist it, is POLITICAL TRANSFORMATION, in
both the South and the North. Democracy is on the agenda and that's
first. The Green Party in every country, North and South, has a solemn
and glorious task: to be that political force that can so act within
their own body politic that they achieve a substantial turning and
tempering of their respective government into new pathways and new
directions. This is the key to planetary sanity, healing, and hope.
Of major significance, once again,
is what happens in the United States. The Greens here need all the
help they can get. Part of that help is a gentle but firm
understanding among Greens everywhere of just what is at stake and how
critical it is that the Green struggle for political power in the
United States be supported, for it is far more important than it has
hitherto been thought to be.
Democracy. Community. Solar
technology. Conservation ethic. Global Cooperation. There is implicit
in this the need to think through what a planetary government might
look like. We do need a vision of a federated world, for that would
provide us with a sense of where we are going, of what kind of a world
order can and should be ours in this next millenium. I will offer my
own (very modest) idea for a planetary goverment in the next, the
fourth Piece.