Coordinating Committee Meeting
Saturday, July 19, 2000
Washington, DC
Mayflower Hotel—State Room
David Rovics—"Coke is the drink of the
Death Squads"
Persons are reminded to begin on time, that we may
end on time
NY-Julia Willebrand—Re: today's agenda, being as
how we ran almost 1 hour late yesterday. . .
Today's BRPP agenda has been shortened by 1 hr.
Please write agenda concerns for the SC.
The SC is setting the Agenda for this meeting
Green Network Officeholders Proposal
NC - Gray Newman –
Amy—Laramie, WY City Council
John Eder
Over 170 Officeholders in the US
ME, FL, AK, HI. . .
Also places you might not expect: WY, TX, NC
In May of 2002, an officeholders list was
established. In November, the thought of a network evolved.
Most are the only Green on their own
council/board/legislature, etc.
In February 2003, the Green Officeholders had their second ever
gathering in Santa Monica (there was an earthquake). We discussed a
way to mesh with the Coordinating Committee.
Since then, certain recommendations have been
developed, some of which come to this floor today.
PROPOSAL: (was presented as written)
Change:
Choosing [Representatives] and Alternates
Additional rule/procedure: All fundraising monies
will be routed through the GPUS Treasury
QUESTIONS/COMMENTS:
TX—David Pollard—Not all officials are elected, some are
appointed. Are there any plans to include appointed officeholders?
(It will include those who were appointed to elected offices)
For instance, will it include appointed Judges?
MI—Since you are creating a new status of membership on committees,
there needs to be a change in the bylaws
Il-Mark Samson—A non-voting member to be on CCC also (now a 10
member position elected by this body)—Would this change the number
of members to 11? (yes)
IL—Liz Moran—Network Membership—Does it also include elected
precinct committee officeholders?
OR—Paul—What is the benefit to the Party of creating this Network?
Why do officeholders need a non-voting position on this body?
DC—Maya O'Connor—Does it include those elected to a non-partisan
position?
Echo—Voting can be done in committees, yes? (yes)
HI—Andy—BRPP member—What are the implications for BRPP? What
does a "Network" mean and what does it include?
Would it be possible to fit the Green Officeholders network into the
current structure?
Jane Hunter—Does the network include Greens who don't run as Greens?
(Yes)
NY—Julia W—Is there a mission statement? (There is a Founding
Declaration on the next page)
WA—What does "Adopt" mean? Is this a one-time need, or
might be there other Networks?
Do all monies just "Go through" the network, or does the
GPUS keep some? (yes)
Daniel Alden—Would an Independent running under the Green banner be
eligible or do you have to be a party member? Also, what's up with the
3rd Bylaw?
Kevin McKeown—Mayor Pro-tem of Santa Monica—asking
for party's assistance in creating what we elected Greens need so we
can better connect with each other and the grassroots of the
Party."
Dean Myerson—In the proposal development it was
asked, do we fit the structure into the existing bylaws or creates
something new? It was felt that a new thing was needed, given the
unique nature of the officeholders' connection.
Officeholders generally have no time to vote, but they want to have
input.
Most officeholders get little assistance from their staff—sometimes
even resistance from their staffs. . .
Mike Feinstein—re: Who is part of the network? Everyone who is a
member of a State Green Party (as defined by the state party) is a
potential member of the Network. Language is meant to be Bylaw ideal.
Caucuses—5 min.
15 min. remain.
Framing Comment: re; Why a Network, not a Caucus
or Committee? "Caucuses are for oppressed minorities; I'm an
Irish politician. Committees are formed with a specific agenda in
mind." What we're looking for is communication. We want to start
quickly and need your support.
BRPP –just seeing this for the first time. Likes
the idea. Concerned about the implications, especially to bylaws. Need
to flesh out, harmonize with existing bylaws.
CA—Peter Camejo—We must be careful. In the history of other
parties, the elected officials tend to develop an association that is
parallel to the party, and it is always more conservative. They must
not issue public statements, or begin, ever, to be mistaken for the
Green Party. Beware, take note of what has happened in other
countries.
MN—Steven Ezninger—Would like to see language that people in the
network have gone through an endorsement process by their state or
local.
RI—Tony—Agree with fear of developing parallel party. This is
sudden, being as BRPP has not seen this. Provisional support is also
dicey. Don't agree with conceptual approach, would like to see a
formal vote to endorse the concept but ask they work with the BRPP to
work on getting formal language adopted.
AK—Diedre Hefflerich—liking the idea, but concerned about the
specific requests for placement on certain committees, especially for
the standing member of the Green Pages (Concern about Editorial
Independence) Also, some definitions need clarifying.
FL—Milo Lucci—Suggests to table and asking BRPP and new org to
work together
RI--Joe Buchannan—GP should be supporting our elected officials, not
say no to their proposals.
ME—John Rensenbrink—Supports Joe, understands concerned of
parallel officeholders' party—it has occurred in Europe—but this
is a good proposal that we should support. We should recognize we have
to have votes.
CA—Mike Wyman—Affirmation of the proposal. Concern (for friendly
amendment):In addition to having a report back from the BRPP, we
should also have a report back from the Treasurer, re. implications,
regulatory compliance, etc.
OH—Anita Rios—This is positive. Changes to bylaws are natural as
we grow and change. Still there are gaps, we need to make use of
elected officials.
Kevin McKeown -- We chose to ask for network
status because committee or caucus don't fit. A caucus is supposed to
be for underrepresented minorities. I'm an Irish politician .
We want better communication between elected officials and other
Greens. The purpose is to connect elected Greens more closely with the
party, not to further empower them."
Mike F.—Agreed that the proposal should go to
BRPP, not just the concepts to be approved, but the details also, with
the language to be defined later..
Proposal:
That we take the extant proposal, permission to go forward with the
network and refer to BRPP to bring it back later in final form, with
the intent to allow continued organizing for the network
Financial proposal (to route proposal through Finance Committee)
accepted as a friendly amendment.
"This group will endorse the Green
Officeholders Network to continue organizing, that we will
provisionally accept these categories, and will refer the proposal to
the BRPP, Finance committee, and in consultation with the CCC, with
the specifics that it will come back to this group for approval with
refined language as appropriate.
It would include non-voting representatives to the committees, who are
not covered by the bylaws so we need to bring them in.
Outstanding concerns should please be written and brought back for
consideration.
SC noted many delegates not ready to stand aside
on questions about process.
When a state requests that someone who is not a
delegate to speak, the whole CC must approve. Approved.
There are remaining unresolved concerns.
CCC—Current bylaws do not allow for non-voting
members.
NY--Rachel Treichler—per meeting rules
yesterday, what is this process by which the proponents can call for a
vote?
Referred to Number 9.
How can the proponents call the question?
[should be referred to 10—Closing options]
NJ—Gary Novaselski—We are past Step 9 on to Step 10—Closing
options. What is not clear is who has the power to decide the closing
options. [actually, this is clear, on the back of the sheet:
"presenters have the power to:"]
BRPP has agreed to sacrifice 15 minutes of time to
further this.
Question of Lavender Caucus' voting status.
LC was, a year ago, given provisional acceptance for 6 months.
Their votes have been accepted online.
Proposed to extend the LC provisional vote until Sunday, when it will
be officially approved.
PASSED
Any unresolved concerns?
WA, VT, NY, AL, AK, MN, MI, IL
[# ]
Votes for:81
Votes against: 19
Abstentions: 5
Proposal PASSES.
Unresolved concerns should be stated, and will be
in the future.
Finance Committee –
Jo Chamberlain
Budget Time: What we have, what we will get, and how we will spend it.
Time to walk through the refined budget numbers.
Budget was supposed to be over 800k. 300k already
received this year. We will fall 20-25% below that projected forecast
(unless everybody starts writing checks now). We need commitment for
$5-10,000 each in fundraising from the states.
We will break for lunch at noon.
The proposed changes are not, technically, cuts.
They are movements of budgeted monies from Tier 1 to Tier 2.
"What is the difference between Tier 1 and Tier 2?"
Tier 1 is more realistic. Tier 2 is more idealistic.
Tier 1 is the core expenditures that we are confident we can fund.
Currently we are falling short of our projected Tier 1 budget, so we
are shifting monies to T2.
30% overhead charge for staff
There was a proposal to move the GPUS to Canada to get healthcare for
all, but it did not seem feasible.
Finance Director's expense account has been cut dramatically. Thank
you, Jack.
DC Office
Orig. budget was $2500.
New rent will be $1764. Supplies and Util. Will be the same. Revision
to add $600 for postal expenses corrects an error in the first budget.
Category drops to $50k.
Political Coordinator also accepted a cut in the expense account.
(Thank you, Dean)
Office Manager was laid off—total monies paid were $6k.
DC office drops from $176k to $115k.
Steering Committee
Financial increases are moved from Tier 1 to Tier 2—there will be no
increases unless fundraising skyrockets.
Caucus monies are halved.
Venue balances to zero.
Merchandising—now balances to a small profit.
SC summary drops from 68k to 41k
CCC (Jusha)
11k shifted to T2
Fundraising—6k to tier 2
Total T1 budget now 38k
Diversity (Anita Rios)
[need these numbers]
Media
3k from staff stipend shifted to Tier 2
Altogether:
116k now adjusted from T1 to T2, so expenses match expected income.
Questions:
PE—Carl Romanelli—Where does the 1000 for 1000 campaign stand?
CA—Mike—No line item for total on expenses?
Starlene Rankin—What about hiring freezes, will they be lifted?
HI—What about health insurance?
NC—Gray—Extra Rooms for conference?
CA—Greg—Clarification on Gross Income: What is the adjusted
fundraising figure?
VA—Tom –More detail on precinct and polling analysis?
CA—Beth Moore, Gemini—There is a donation envelope in the packet—We
may give monthly to our states and or locals, we may not give to the
National. . .
Also, why are we cutting media right before a major election year?
Especially the staff stipend for Scott McLarty. . .?
Jo Chaimberlain (CA)—
The amount is between 12k and 15k/mo. Don't know total number of
contributors—maybe Dean?
Media is funded w/ stipend of $500/mo.
Health Insurance is very high. We're insuring families, not
individuals, we're insuring individuals with health problems in
different states, we don't qualify for a group plan.
Mayflower was more expensive than Howard U,
especially meeting the room quota. We will negotiate & work out a
deal with hotel management later. We also have extra photocopy fees.
Accreditation committee agrees to move $1000 in travel budget to Tier
2, challenges other committees to do the same.
Tom Sevigny (CT):
Thanks for your suggestions, wait until next week, we will review and
discuss this online during the next week, no time to incorporate now.
BRPP-Future Issues for Review
Gregg (RI)
6 Item Priority List
1. Discussed Yesterday
2. Network Definition
3. Definition of Caucuses/roles
4. Proposal Process
5. We take votes online. We try to do consensus process in the room.
There is not yet a process for consensus online. Need model, Sarah
Hier (IL) is working on this, has suggestions, will send out.
6. ? [Grievance Process]
Sarah Heyer—re. Consensus—anyone who wants to
discuss it more? Tonight, 9pm, Room 639
WA—Jody—Need for guidelines/protocols for
online communication, both for decency and process factors.
Bylaw for structural changes should go through the BRPP. Grievance
Process?
--?
Nathalie—Secretary--Delegate Packet Index is
circulating. Last 2 pages are welcome, packet to be sent when people
subscribe to the listserv. Please forward comments within 2 weeks.
Suggested to circulate on internet.
VA—Susan Dridi—States are not all linked on
gp.org website—if state doesn't have a site, that's not the site's
fault
Website is the domain of the Communications Committee—It is
unfortunate to set a precedent of cross-jurisdictional interference.
Since the website is a port of entry for many
communications, we need to resolve the decision-making process for
what gets on, who puts it on, and we need consensus. Ex. Lavender has
special line but individual states don't. Procedural issues. Need to
set up rules of process for inclusion on website. One committee
shouldn't oversee work of another.
Summary of Yesterday's Comments in BRPP Discussion
*Communication
*Accountability
*Transparency
--Each committee should be writing its own rules
People like the idea of delegates being asked, but not forced, to
serve on at least 1 committee. How to motivate them remains
unresolved.
Resistance to hierarchical structure, over-centralization, maybe
language issues, need clarity. Maybe write Job Descriptions first, SC
maybe should go ahead, what is "coordinator" vs
"facilitator"?
What is the relationship of State Parties and Committees?
Many accepted the Portfolio concept, but wanted it more flexible.
Why don't committee co-chairs network together on conference calls?
The concept of an Oversight Committee seemed to confuse people,
morphed into a "Mediation Committee" by the end. . .
Comments will be posted online.
Andy (HI):
The Coordinating Committee (this body) IS the National Green Party. WE
are responsible for the work of all committees, including the Steering
Committees. CCC gets all inquiries to GP, passes on to SC.
Our problem is that we have not precisely delegated tasks and issues
to the Steering Committee. We need this body, to input to the BRPP, to
help solidify & tighten up these areas of
delegation/responsibility.
Alternative Concepts include the idea of "floaters"—2
delegates assisting the SC They want suggestions of how and who to
delegate. . .
Maybe 7 co-chairs with 2 floaters, need to review structure.
Nathalie—Each committee should have a very
specific mission statement. Don't get too specific or closed in stone,
leave room for flexibility.
FL—Don't try to encumber SC with specific tasks so much other than
to delegate/empower others. Flexibility is valuable.
MI—Carol—Bad about reading minutes of the SC—could they make
lists of decisions already made to review and consider?
TX—credit to the existing structure. Let us not hinder the growth
that has occurred.
WA—Jolene Powell—Not that sure what decisions the SC has made, so
hard to know what decisions we want the SC to make. Can these be put
out for comment?
MD—Linda Schade—re. Communications & Portfolios—could
someone from each committee be tasked with keeping the SC informed
about committee activity?
ME—John Rensenbrink All delegates should participate in committees
if possible.
AFTER LUNCH
Sweet Honey in the Rock
"No taxation without representation"
Michelle Tingling Clemmons, Washington, DC
DC Statehood Green Party
"I see myself as a colonial, last colony in
country. My children were born into the colony of the District of
Columbia.
Problems in DC: more taxes per capita than any other state, but no
vote. Congress controls our line items. Many other problems.
And I hope I can enlist your help today. The mission is statehood for
DC. If GP wants to distinguish itself, this is issue.
All that is required for DC statehood is a majority vote in the House
and in the Senate. We need a vote in House & Senate; help us find
way to put them on floor. We want our rights & we want them now.
T-shirts so rest of country can know about problem, people from other
states shocked when they find out, please support.
Also, DC has been a leader in pushing for a Nuclear Free Reality, HR
2647. DC is a nuclear free zone.
Let one of the calls for party be Statehood for DC, waiting over 200
years
FREE DC!!!
Assorted Proposals and Reports
Tom Sevigny introduced
Brian Sandberg—National Director for the Campus Greens
Now based in Northampton, MA
Came on board at the end of March
3 room office to pack with interns this fall, to support 200+ chapters
Nat'l convention in Austin, Aug. 7
Setting up the first Green Party primary National Debates
Troublesome last year, but we are rebuilding and moving forward.
Best way is to develop good projects.
1. Future Focus Institute: 2 weeks electoral organizing and training.
(Check the Flyer!)
Immediate Goals of program: to ID and develop 80 more young activists
each year—turn them into experienced organizers. To have immediate
impact on local campaigns across the country (2 or 3 young interns can
make the difference between winning & losing) To wit: John Eder—Maine
State Rep.
Do you feel it, too? Something is really happening here. We are
becoming more thoughtful, smoother, more professional, more competent,
right before our own eyes. Have many interns? We could get more from
campus greens if more tools available, with them we can win, have
workshops, go cross-country, inject their energy & produce
results.
The only thing preventing us from winning more races, is getting more
tools into the hands of more good candidates. Greens can win, and will
win. There will be direct effect of more Campus Greens working on more
races, can make difference, need support.
The only thing holding us back is a commitment to developing
organizers
1. Identify the campaigns to put the young organizers on.
2. Identify the students & select. To get 80 students we need 300
applicants and 500 possibles, can have real impact around the country.
3. Really the first thing: Seed Money. Need to find resources to hold
program together, opportunity to move forward. Revenue is tight. It's
always hard to ask for money, but we request that everyone here,
before you leave, write a small check to the Campus Greens.
WA—Jody—What about the status of individual
campus chapters fearing mal-consequences of affiliating directly with
the state or national political party, could lose money from campus.
What up with that? (Need to explore & find answers.)
CA—Beth Moore Haines—Challenge to other locals: consider
supporting CG chapters at local levels, example of several local high
schools.
OR—Marnie Glickman—CGs have agreed to help develop the pacific
northwest campaign school.
PE—Carl Romanelli—The campus greens are huge! Among most important
organizational tools, they are more committed to change than regular
voters, directly connected to growth in local communities in country.
IPPN Report
IPPN - Independence Progressive Politics Network
Requesting to renew our membership for participation for another year
Annual meeting was in Ann Arbor last week, hosted by Michigan Green
Party
CA—Clarifying Questions: Stood aside concerns last year on the issue
of a written affiliation agreement—is there one signed? How much are
dues? ($200) From where in budget? Is there enough left for other
affiliations? What about diversity? (Hard to assess, but IPPN is more
diverse than we are.)
Any progress in bringing IPPN members into party?
Dues are $200/yr. More diverse but GP bigger, provides forum to
discuss issues in African-American communities, Cynthia McKinney
keynote speaker, on C-Span. It has been a mixed bag. (Badilli Jones is
the official representative to the IPPN.)
DC—Jenefer Ellingston—The Greens should surely affiliate with this
group, as with so many other positive progressive groups. Maintain
contacts, many good reasons, Positive Networking is a large part of
what we're not doing, but should be. Good IPPN work after GWB
Selection.
Nathalie—In favor of affiliating for at least one more year.
NY—Howie Hawkins—In favor of Affiliating, helpful for contacts
with independents
CA—Ginny Case— Should we really do this now?
Anita—As part of Renewal, a clarification of Roles for contacts with
IPPN, put aside for vote later.
Straw Poll—in favor of later, online vote, raise
your cards (maybe 20 cards up) In favor of trying to reach consensus
now (vast majority)
Concerns that are standing aside, more specific on
language [1]
Concerns that would not stand aside [4]
Proposal: To renew membership to IPPN for another year, clarify
relationship, conditional on further definition of the mutual
responsibilities of IPPN and the Green Party by September 1, 2003.
Consensus Test—5 Stand-Aside Concerns
No Concerns that would not Stand Aside.
Proposal PASSED.
UFPJ
United For Peace and Justice—George Martin (WI), largest coalition
in country, 660 organizations, organized many peace marches, first
convention last month in Chicago, 500+ participants, massive agenda,
86 proposals for action on war & peace, workshop on elections for
2004, A. Rios was there, getting different points of view, GP had
chance to explain issue of spoiler effect. Of 86 issues, only key
proposals were addressed.
Elizabeth
Re: Elections to Steering Committee for UFPJ
Eliz was nominated, as was a member of the Campus Greens. Election was
done on paper, by organizations, without the individuals being
introduced. No GPUS or Campus Greens were elected. George was elected
as part of another organization.
In future, Pushing for more local organization representation and less
Nat'l.
George volunteered to lead the Elections WG, make peace relevant to GP
agenda.
Voting Process
Sunday vote for SC & CCC
GP Platform and Bylaws call for Proportional Representation (PR)
There are many kinds of PR, the kind we use is single transferable
vote – STV, also called choice voting. Sample Ballot is in the
packet.
Ranked voting for co-chairs. Please do not put Xs or Checks on the
ballot. However many you vote for, rank them by number. The counting
system is explained online.
The CCC election will also be using this Ranked Voting System.
The accounting system is more complex. It has been
on the web.
There is a threshold number of votes candidates need to win, depending
on how many people vote and how many offices are up (for the CC—3).
TX –Proposal. Re: The right of the CC to re-open
nominations for positions with insufficient candidates, TX, for lots
of good reasons, jointly & unanimously nominates Tom Sevigny for
Secretary.
Bylaw interpretation comes back to this body for a
majority vote.
Process point. Would Tom accept the nomination? (Yes—he has resigned
from running for the SC Co-Chair).
SC reviews
Bylaws:
"Nominations may be reopened at the meeting of the CC if there
were insufficient nominations." Ambiguity lies in the word
"insufficient."
VA—There is a write-in space on the ballot.
RI—Tony Affigne—Rules are for a 1 month review period for a
contested election. Question of "Insufficient number of
Candidates"—what does this mean? We can do 2 things—we can
suspend our own bylaws and set a wild precedent to suspend bylaws, or
We can go with the extant ballot and anyone can write in anybody in
the room.
No time budgeted on the agenda: Pause for
reflection.
No discussion on question of bylaw interpretation—it goes straight
to a vote for simple majority. The motion is not about suspending the
bylaws, which is also different (and also gets no discussion).
TX--P.O.O. There has already been (significant)
discussion on this issue. At least a rebuttal is in order.
FL—When was it announced that Tom had withdrawn from SC candidacy?
(well, now)
NE—Is anyone else withdrawing their candidacies?
Proposal by the SC—allocating 10 minutes for
this proposal, hearing from people for 30 seconds.
PASSED by show of Cards
WA—Last year, bylaws were suspended to allow a
nomination at last minute, not responsible thing to do.
VA—Why not ask Tom what he'd prefer
TX—We agreed to this to make sure that there was not clear
definition
More candidates is healthy. Contested elections are healthy.
TX—Choice is important, we should have the opportunity to explore
the differing views, who we have in position is crucial.
--This is not a suspension of the bylaws. By way of promoting
contested elections throughout the world, we should have them
ourselves whenever possible.
ME—Tom Fusco (Alternate Delegate)—from the out side looking in
this looks manipulative, contrived and petty
Julia—It is rude to this body to bring this up at this point in
time, don't change rules
Holly—IA—concerned about process
Carol Miller—NM—Unfair to us all that we're having this
discussion. It's been known for a long time that the Secretary seat
was uncontested. We have to play by our own rules, move to cut off
discussion.
RI—Joseph Buchanan—
OH—Anita Rios— Bothered that there is only one candidate for the
position. This was an honest effort to make a contested election—not
some huge conspiracy.
LavCauc.—Bad Vibes now, divisive, shouldn't be debated.
IL-Need two-thirds vote to suspend bylaws
NE-Cindy—We've been campaigned for the last month. This is unfair to
those who have made decisions on rankings.
VA—This bylaw should be sent to the BRPP. Meanwhile, lets not get
upset over process when substance is more important.
NM –This vote is illegal unless there is a suspension of the bylaws
Return to the Proposal on the floor: Nomination—accept
or decline.
Does the CC accept the responsibility of making this decision?
Yes means you vote to accept the nomination.
Proposal: Because there are currently insufficient
candidates to make a contested election, etc. . ., Tom Sevigny is
nominated for the position of Secretary. Abstentions: 11
No: 52
Yes: 42
Motion FAILS
AK—Deborah Alpern—Is Tom still running for the
SC? (No—he is a write-in candidate for the position of Secretary,
and he will not speak as if he were running for Co-Chair)
Candidates:
Juscha Robinson--MI—Incumbent, current co-chair, proud of work on
the CCC. Please look through the bios. Help support local campaigns
Gray Newman—NC—only elected official running for the Committee
that helps elect, unique perspective. Volunteers are key. Won by about
1 vote per precinct. Would address the quest for database of campaign
suppliers. Shoestring budgeting: 36k votes by $700 (under 2 cents/vote
in a district half as big as RI)
Penny Teal—CT—Incumbent, ran for state senate, worked for Nader,
served on CCC for year & a half. Wants to help Susan Kin with
Candidate recruitment strategy
Joseph P. Buchanan—RI—Incumbent, Would help CCC get black and
minority candidates into this org. need candidates of color &
funding, will help enlist candidates, esp. candidates of Color. This
is one of the few parties that will embrace people of color. I am a
big, aggressive, but friendly and loveable, black man, so go ahead and
vote for me.
Masada—NY—incumbent, worked on website need to support campaign at
all levels
Susan King—CA—incumbent, worked on training, developing manual,
committed to recruiting candidates, esp. of color and women
Marnie Glickman—incumbent
Ross—Withdrawn
Dan Kinney—PE—has co-chaired w/Juscha for the last year. Set up
campaign hotline, need to give technical resources, i.e. voter history
& tools. Keep giving candidates impeccable resources—so
critical. We can beat the old parties at their own game. Adrianna MI—ran
as candidate for Lt. Gov. Collected 56k sigs in 6 months. Diversity is
key, and we must fight to let people of color, and all people,
understand that this party is a great vehicle, address issue that GP
mainly white, some think racist, need to expand participation
Mike Livingston—MD—Incumbent, Wants to work for candidates that
are ready to be elected. Was the first state (City/District) don't tie
hands of candidates, example of problems for Linda Schade with $100
limit contributions
Roy Williams—TX—Thanks and praise to the creator that brings us
all together here, now. The Green party is the only hope that America
has to. . .increase the Bill of Rights, and to carry this nation
forward. . . .I'm here to bring the conscious awareness to this
collective body that we must be inclusive, we must come together and
let (etcetera) participate in the level that we/they should. Need to
address issue that minorities not included, lack of presence in
African-American communities troubling, must be inclusive if GP is
truly about democracy, peace, concerned about disenfranchised, need
funding
Steering Committee Statements
Tony, Joe, Morgan, Mike, Alan, Ben
Tony: challenge over next 2 years to make
democracy happen, clear & concise budgeting, more engaging public
face of party
M Glickman – must apply values to work, walk our talk to reshape
future & world, can be grassroots, embrace transparency, focus on
decentralization. Need creative feminist structures, sustainable,
prioritize expenditures based on strategy, do more to support
campaigns
Ben Manski (WI)—This body is made up of incredibly hard working,
passionate, intelligent people. First national director of Campus
Greens. I'm youngest in this room, and have extensive Green
experience. Worked hard for unity between the factions of the party,
and am proud of the caucuses and a result of that unity. Worked hard
to foster conciliation—am proud of receiving support from people who
won't speak to each other.
The next year is vital for party. I want to keep the growth curve
growing. So it cannot be said 7 generations ahead that we stood aside
in a time of crisis.
Jo Chamberlain (CA)—It was an honor when you elected me in 2000, and
it is an honor now. I do the administration, because foundation for
organization.
The one thing which we have, and which we must protect, is our
integrity, line up to values. You know how they say, "Stuff runs
downhill?" Well, at the bottom of that hill of the Green Party of
the United States is the SC.
My complaint. First, it is true: We, the CC, Are the GP of the US. And
you may not realize it, but when we leave here on Sunday, SC will feel
abandoned
Alan Kobrin (FL)—I'm here because I want to help take this vision
and make sure that people around the country and around the world, get
a chance to get to know us.
We are incredible people, each of us has an incredible story of how we
got here.
If people can find out whats in our hearts, our minds, our platform
and our values, people will line up behind us & show vision for
future.
Member of Miami/Dade election reform coalition.
What happens here is amazing. People need to see this!
We have to reappropriate our language of Freedom, of Justice, see ad
with Statue of Liberty, we are the new Patriots of this land, I want
to make it known, and I want all of you to come along.
Morgen d'Arc (ME)—Looking at this room, I had a
flashback to the UN.
I believe that we will elect a Green president in 2004. And visions
and images are great, but they have to be grounded in reality. There
are a lot of things that have to be done to ground our visions. Need
to empower Coord Committee. Focus more on goal setting, priority
setting. Attention on Diversity, our future is there also. A
grievance/mediation process is also necessary. Bumps in the road will
slow us down—our grievances need attention. We have some serious
numbers, and we have to practice negotiation with outside
organizations. We can negotiate hard.
Greg Gerritt (RI)—I want to be your Secretary.
What does your secretary do? He gets information to you in a timely
and effective fashion. Need to improve communications
I come to you with experience. I was secretary for the Maine Green
party, a long time ago, secretary for the Rhode Island
One of the things we have to do better is to welcome new delegates.
You know the story of Tom Sawyer and the whitewashed fence (this is
history—we have to be aware of our history, grounded in American
culture)
The only way this work gets done is if You All do it, if We All do it.
We will reconvene at 4:15. . .
Saturday, July 19, 2003
Black Caucus
Michelle Tingling-Clemmons (DC)
Diane White (PE)—Mayoral Candidate in Harrisburg, PE
Beautiful woman in Green Spoke too fast (MA)
Joe Buchanan(RI)
Jason Ravin (DC)
Roy Williams (TX)
Malik Raheem (LA) Green for 9 years
George DeCarlo
Div. Com is over 100 strong.
We see the GP as the solution and salvation for our people in America.
We are trained in terms of outreach… not used to marketing!
Reminder: our country will soon be majority of minorities…ask for
test market.
How to reach out & build trust? We had to dig for relevant issues,
found good stuff in platform. Our mission to translate, address issues
like healthcare, education, misdirected war on drugs, illicit justice
system, reparations, need to differentiate from republicans, end War
on Drugs, affirm. Action, Reparations. Can help in colleges to draw in
minorities.
Targeting historical black colleges, suggested black tour of America
for GP, bring in black notables & prominent individuals, bring in
young blacks to vote systematically, relate experience to platform.
NEVER FORGET FLORIDA
GP joined demo at state cap, we will not forget.
Translate our issues to votes…clarification sheet.
Asking you as family to support. Need $ for multiple college tour
$6600 for first event, issues have appeal, need travel money
Chuck D! Public Enemy, Walter Mosley: wrote: we ought to be the ones
to lead the revolution.
We want to lead the revolution! Money for Website to promote tour,
part-time staff
If it doesn't pay for itself, we will cut next budget, need $33,000
for test market
to grow African-American participation in GP, grow to be party of
future, party of the people.
Questions/Comments:
Beth CA – Support, but procedural problems. How do bylaws address
requests for money, Diversity Commmittee (DC)? Any check to see who
would go? What do people proposed for tour expect re $?
(Went thru DC. Jason & I have spoken to some, not final
commitment, some outreach, Moseley has agreed for first event planned
for DC, also Chuck-D. Proposal put together by volunteers. Important
qualifier: all are independent, concur w/green values, already
committed.
When will we have this money? Want to do this right! Successful &
professional, get past mindset of doing halfway, asking approval as
concept & step to next level
Are speaker fees necessary? funding already in
diversity budget
Marnie of OR—How does this request for funds fit into DC budget?
Jane NJ—How to define success? (cost/benefit analysis with outreach)
MN Steven—1st 2 items doable w/o fulltime staff? (no doing it
halfassed)
Event should pay for itself, $5 admission
MI—Borrow the money?
Mark—likes proposal, new members bring in $, SC role in clearing
staff hires? (yes)
Any consideration of half & half? National pays half, state pays
half? (we'll be alright with national) We will be flexible.
AK—initial funds? $30K? or less?
Do we have to use advertising & Ticketmaster? (no)
Jack: will give his all, fundraising committee committed to assist
Black Caucus. There is a way.
George: Asking for trust to prove we're family,
compare to how much Democratic party spends to woo blacks. Don't want
to be put in position of negotiating with states for money, focus on
setting it up. Working on this since Philadelphia, proposal submitted
last December.
Too many people think GP means white. We needed to
do this yesterday!
Money for next event set aside before hooking up GP
Gary--Who does staff report to? Will budget be amended to show
additional expenses? (finance comm. Has BC member)
Susan NC—who is on this on the SC? How long? (proposal has been
around since December)
Concerns & Affirmations:
Tony RI—any investment for future always risky. Supports prop, risk
is small compared to benefit to party & also need to demonstrate
trust
Cindy NE—Wonderful, crucial to recruit voters in African-American
communities,
IL--Liz—some student orgs can't be partisan or be charged admission,
GP can become a black party, this is a first step
Clare HI—Critical proposal, will write a personal check for $1000!
Challenges others to do the same or what they can.
Steve WA—Saw no minority representatives in crowds, trust black
caucus, has $50 cash to give, urge all support
VT—Cooperating w/region would be a good thing, as events expand, go
to NE where blacks have less dense populations.
Dave Pollard TX—refuse to treat staffers as volunteers, support
living wage for staff!
TN—Would be honored to work w/you, bridge of understanding, 2 black
colleges in Nashville will support
PA- responsibility of national, not states, 2 years ago party had no
money, now have $, use on this kind of proposal, no better way
Various affirmations…
States set up for competitive bid, especially CA
NC- contacts already, event waiting to happen
NYC suggests including Elizabeth Horton-Sheff (?), Jennifer Daniels
Unresolved concerns: none
PASSED UNANIMOUSLY!
Thanks for support, will submit caucus for
accreditation next week
Recess.