State Green Party Press Release

Greens Urge Election Reform Democrat and Republican Parties Fail to Respond.

Green Party of Delaware

MEDIA RELEASE
For immediate release:
Tuesday, January 7, 2003

Contact:
J. Roy Cannon, Media Committee
Green Party of Delaware
(302)738-9963
jcannon11@comcast.net

Greens Urge Election Reform Democrat and Republican Parties Fail to Respond
Independent, Libertarian, Natural Law parties join Greens in calling for Instant Runoff Voting in Delaware

Wilmington, DE -- In response to the 2002 elections which saw a pivotal 3-way race for the office of Attorney General, the Green Party of Delaware has initiated discussion with Delaware¹s ballot qualified parties to establish Instant Runoff Voting (IRV). While all other parties support an IRV initiative, the Democratic and Republican parties ignored the Green¹s invitation to open a dialogue on IRV election reform.

³The need for IRV in Delaware is very clear², said Vivian Houghton, 2002 Green Party candidate for Attorney General. ³The failure of the Democratic and Republican parties to respond is a symptom of their bankruptcy with Delaware¹s voters and rigamortis approach to a changing political scene. IRV is a Œwin-win¹ measure for all parties and a needed reform to improve democracy in our state², said Houghton.

The 2002 Attorney General¹s race produced a dubious Œwinner¹ where Jane Brady did not receive a majority of the votes cast (48%). IRV ensures that a winning candidate receives an absolute majority of votes rather than a simple plurality. IRV accomplishes this without the high cost and delay associated with two-round runoff elections by allowing voters to rank their candidates in order of preference on Election Day. If no one candidate receives a majority of votes for a particular office, IRV Œkicks in¹ using votes cast to elect a majority winner.

³The Green Party initiated IRV in Delaware for many good reasons², said Karen Lienau, the state Green Party¹s Chairperson. ³Besides insisting that a winner receive a majority of votes to hold office, a basic tenet of democracy, IRV allows for a better choice and wider voter participation, accommodates multiple candidates in single seat races, and assures that a Œspoiler¹-effect does not result in undemocratic outcomes². Ms. Lienau continued, ³IRV allows all voters to vote for their favorite candidate without fear of helping elect their least favorite candidate².

³The 2002 Attorney General¹s race saw over 50,000 more voters involved in the elections than in the 1998 elections. I think much of this increase can be attributed to our Œin-the street¹ style campaign that energized and reengaged many disaffected voters², said Bob Bohm, Houghton¹s campaign manager. ³And, frankly, her campaign was more than the margin of difference between who won and who lost. As the Green Party fields more Delaware candidates in the future, the Democratic and Republican parties would be smart to get behind IRV legislation.²

IRV allows voters to rank candidates according to their first choice, second choice, third choice, and so on. If a candidate does not receive a clear majority of votes on the first count, a series of Œinstant¹ runoff counts are conducted, using each voter¹s top choice indicated on the ballot. The candidate who receives the fewest first place ballots is eliminated. All ballots are then retabulated, with each ballot counting as one vote for each voter¹s favorite candidate who is still in contention. Voters who chose the eliminated candidate have their second choice vote count for candidates still in contention. The process continues until a candidate receives a majority of votes.

IRV is currently in use in San Francisco. In Vermont, over 50 towns and the State Labor Council AFL-CIO voted to support IRV for statewide elections. Senator John McCain endorsed Alaska¹s IRV ballot measure.

In conclusion, IRV:

-Ensures majority rule
-Saves money compared to costly two-round runoff elections (which often have low voter turnout)
-Increases voter turnout by giving voters more choices
-Promotes positive, issue-based campaigns because candidates will seek 2nd and 3rd choice votes
-Creates a clearer mandate for a winning candidate¹s agenda, giving better direction for policy-making
-Solves the problem of groupings of voters splitting their votes among similar candidates
-Minimizes Œwasted¹ votes, votes that don¹t help elect a winner. To the fullest extent possible, a vote contributes to electing a candidate a voter likes the most

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Green Party of Delaware
P. O. Box 6044
Wilmington, Delaware 19804
(302)738-9963
greenpartyde@yahoo.com
http://www.gpde.org

Center for Voting and Democracy
www.fairvote.org