Home

Greens Still Say 'NO' to Hunting Michigan's Bird of Peace.

Green Party of Michigan
http://www.migreens.org

June 10, 2004
 
 
For More Information Contact:
----------------------------
John Anthony La Pietra -- Media Committee, GPMI
    phone:    269-781-9478
    e-mail:   jalp@internet1.net
 
 
Party Calls on Granholm to Keep Campaign Promise, Veto HB5029
Cite 1998 Resolution Passed by House; Senate Has One This Year

    The Green Party of Michigan (GPMI) is calling on Governor Jennifer Granholm to honor a 2001 campaign promise and veto House Bill 5029, which would open a hunting season on the mourning dove -- recognized by the state House as the Michigan Bird of Peace.

    The party issued a public statement back in November which cites that legislative declaration -- in House Resolution 244 of 1998, adopted March 25 of that year -- and the traditional public regard for the dove as the symbol of peace.

    Granholm made the promise in a February 2001 response to a candidate survey by HumaneUSA.  The survey asked, "If the legislature finally did pass a dove hunting bill, would you veto such a bill?"  Granholm answered "yes".

    She also said she would veto a bill that would take authority for moving animals on and off the state game list from the legislature and give it to the appointed Natural Resources Commission.

    In discussing the dove-hunting issue last fall, Greens acknowledged that hunting is "an important activity to many Michigan residents", and has contributed to the preservation of habitat for some wild animals. But the party does not believe hunting doves, "the traditionally- and legally-recognized bird of peace[,] is a vital part of anyone's way of life or subsistence."

    GPMI has maintained its stand on principle.  By contrast, Granholm is reportedly "intrigued" about the possibility of a limited hunt in counties on Michigan's southern border.

    John La Pietra of Marshall, GPMI's Calhoun County co-ordinator, opposes dove-hunting.  So, consistently, do 2/3 of Michigan citizens polled.  "HB5029 is not only unpopular, unnecessary, and dangerous -- it's *wrong*," La Pietra wrote in a letter urging Granholm to keep her promise and veto the bill.

     "Whatever one's feelings about hunting in general, if any bird should *not* be a target of hunting, it is the dove . . . which was officially recognized in 1998 as the Michigan Bird of Peace.  And that recognition, building on one of our civilization's oldest traditions, came from the same state House which yielded the latest hunting bill."

    The text of House Resolution 244 and the HumaneUSA questions are shown below.

    For more information on the issue, visit the Songbird Protection Alliance Web site at:

        http://www.savethedoves.org

    For more information about the Green Party of Michigan as it prepares to send a delegation to the GPUS national nominating convention in Milwaukee June 23-28, please visit the GPMI Web site:

        http://www.migreens.org

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

    GPMI Statement Opposing HB5029 and Dove-Hunting (November 2003)

The Green Party of Michigan (GPMI) opposes House Bill 5029, and any other measure to promote hunting of the mourning dove -- recognized throughout the state as Michigan's official bird of peace, in accordance with House Resolution 244 of 1998 (adopted March 25, 1998).

GPMI recognizes that hunting is an important activity to many Michigan residents.  However, we reject the idea that hunting of the traditionally- and legally-recognized bird of peace is a vital part of anyone's way of life or subsistence.

Accordingly, GPMI calls on all members of the Michigan Senate to reject HB5029 and any other dove-hunting measure, and we urge all Michigan citizens with a respect for peace to contact their State Senators and tell them to oppose dove-hunting.

For more information, visit:
   
    http://www.savethedoves.org
 
 
                          #      #      #
 
 
Green Party of Michigan   *    548 S. Main Street   *
                          *  Ann Arbor, MI   48104  *   734-663-3555

House Resolution 244 of 1998 -- Text and Deliberations (from House Journal 30, Page 538)

Reps. Profit, Kukuk, LaForge, Raczkowski, Hale, Prusi, Cherry, Scott,   Kelly, Murphy, Wojno, Voorhees, Vaughn, Anthony, Godchaux, Schroer,   Brater, Parks, Jansen, Wallace and Varge offered the following   resolution:

A resolution recognizing the mourning dove, Zenaida Macroura, as the Michigan Bird of Peace.

Whereas,   The mourning dove is an American bird known for its sad,   cooing call.  Its grayish-brown feathers and long tapering tail   are widely recognized in Michigan, as is its soft and mournful   sound.  The mourning dove, or Zenaida Macroura as it is known in   the scientific realm, is a peaceful songbird; and  

Whereas,   The day of the mourning dove begins early in the morning   when it begins to look for food and water.  The doves then rest   during part of the afternoon, seek more food and water, and before   nightfall, return to their nests built loosely of twigs in a tree   or bush or on the ground.  Many scientists believe that a male and   female mourning dove mate with each other for life.  Bird watchers   will note that mourning doves are often found in pairs and, as   parents, the doves are both responsible for feeding the young,   called squabs, which are born blind and almost featherless; and

Whereas,   The dove has traditionally symbolized peace.  It is often   depicted with an olive branch in its beak.  Mourning doves do not   eat olive branches, but do, however, feed on weed seeds and insects.   It is a peaceful bird which will swiftly fly from conflict on strong   wings that make a whistling sound as they move through the air.  The   mourning dove plays a quiet, but vital role in the fragile and   beautiful ecosystem that is the Michigan water wonderland;

    now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives, That the mourning dove,   Zenaida Macroura, be known throughout the state as the Michigan   Bird of Peace.

Pending the reference of the resolution to a committee,  

Rep. Gagliardi moved that Rule 77 be suspended and the resolution be   considered at this time.

The motion prevailed, 3/5 of the members present voting therefor.

The question being on the adoption of the resolution,

The resolution was adopted, a majority of the members serving voting  therefor.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
 
[the resolution can be found from the MichiganLegislature.org
  Web site via the following page related to it:]
 
http://www.michiganlegislature.org/mileg.... 
The text above is visible via link to the indicated page of the
  House Journal for that day. 
 
 
[=======================================================================]
 
 
    Jennifer Granholm's Campaign Promise to Voters, February 2001
                    [via Humane USA and HEAL-PAC]:
 
 
Question:  MOURNING DOVE HUNTING.
---------------------------------
Mourning Dove Hunting:  Since 1905, the sport hunting of mourning doves
  in Michigan has been illegal.  Michigan citizens recognize that
  mourning dove hunting is not necessary to protect agriculture and
  that the shooting of these birds is little more than target practice
  for hunters.  It is also known that Michigan is part of the doves'
  breeding range meaning the birds mate and breed here at all times
  of the year.  The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has not
  established that there is a overpopulation of doves here.  However,
  the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service studies have shown a decrease in
  their populations in this region.  Over the decades, public opinion
  has been against hunting the doves and in favor of feeding and
  watching the birds at their feeders.  Even the majority of Michigan
  hunters polled opposed dove hunting.  Utility companies fear power
  outages from hunters shooting at doves roosting on power lines.  If
  the legislature finally did pass a dove hunting bill, would you veto
  such a bill?
 
    Answer:  YES
 
 
Question:  AUTHORITY TRANSFER.
------------------------------
Authority Transfer:  In the 1980's the Michigan DNR and Natural
  Resources Commission (NRC) made an attempt to place mourning doves
  on the State Game List without going to the state legislature for
  approval first.  The Michigan Humane Society challenged this in
  court and both the Ingham County District Court and the State Court
  of Appeals ruled against this NRC and DNR maneuver.  The courts
  clearly stated that a major public policy decision, such as putting
  an animal on the Game List for the first time, must reside with the
  legislative branch of government.  This branch is considered most
  representative of and responsive to the citizens of the state --
  who are also the owners of all wildlife.  In 2001, legislation was
  introduced (but not passed) to transfer the authority to move
  animals on and off the Game List from the legislature to the
  non-elected, gubernatorial appointed NRC.  If such a bill were
  passed by the legislature, would you veto it?
 
    Answer:  YES