Initial
count by Accreditation Committee: Credentials Committee to Present
Finalized Numbers
State |
2004
Electoral
Vote |
2004
Electoral
Vote
× 0.5 |
Elected
Greens
(see breakout) |
Voting
Strength
(see breakout) |
Voting
Strength
× 1.75 |
CC |
CC × 1.75 |
Sum |
Delegates |
Percent of
Delegates |
|
|
A |
B |
|
C |
|
D |
A+B+C+D |
|
|
Alabama |
9 |
4.5 |
0.0 |
0.2018390 |
0.35321825 |
2 |
3.50 |
8.353218250 |
9 |
1.08% |
Alaska |
3 |
1.5 |
0.0 |
1.8355920 |
3.21228600 |
2 |
3.50 |
8.212286000 |
9 |
1.08% |
Arizona |
10 |
5.0 |
0.0 |
1.3602210 |
2.38038675 |
2 |
3.50 |
10.880386750 |
11 |
1.32% |
Arkansas |
6 |
3.0 |
0.0 |
0.1959466 |
0.34290655 |
2 |
3.50 |
6.842906550 |
7 |
0.84% |
California |
55 |
27.5 |
53.2 |
15.9946074 |
27.99056295 |
13 |
22.75 |
131.440562950 |
132 |
15.79% |
Colorado |
9 |
4.5 |
4.6 |
4.8002850 |
8.40049875 |
2 |
3.50 |
21.000498750 |
22 |
2.63% |
Connecticut |
7 |
3.5 |
2.4 |
2.8487784 |
4.98536220 |
2 |
3.50 |
14.385362200 |
15 |
1.79% |
Delaware |
3 |
1.5 |
0.0 |
0.8316000 |
1.45530000 |
2 |
3.50 |
6.455300000 |
7 |
0.84% |
D.C. |
3 |
1.5 |
0.0 |
3.0543700 |
5.34514750 |
2 |
3.50 |
10.345147500 |
11 |
1.32% |
Florida |
27 |
13.5 |
2.2 |
1.5890544 |
2.78084520 |
4 |
7.00 |
25.480845200 |
26 |
3.11% |
Georgia |
15 |
7.5 |
0.0 |
0.0698464 |
0.12223120 |
2 |
3.50 |
11.122231200 |
12 |
1.44% |
Hawaii |
4 |
2.0 |
1.0 |
1.2714324 |
2.22500670 |
2 |
3.50 |
8.725006700 |
9 |
1.08% |
Idaho |
4 |
2.0 |
0.2 |
0.3011540 |
0.52701950 |
2 |
3.50 |
6.227019500 |
7 |
0.84% |
Illinois |
21 |
10.5 |
0.2 |
2.2723221 |
3.97656367 |
4 |
7.00 |
21.676563675 |
22 |
2.63% |
Indiana |
11 |
5.5 |
0.0 |
0.1556604 |
0.27240570 |
2 |
3.50 |
9.272405700 |
10 |
1.20% |
Iowa |
7 |
3.5 |
0.6 |
0.6550402 |
1.14632035 |
2 |
3.50 |
8.746320350 |
9 |
1.08% |
Kansas |
6 |
3.0 |
0.0 |
1.2160982 |
2.12817185 |
2 |
3.50 |
8.628171850 |
9 |
1.08% |
Kentucky |
8 |
4.0 |
0.0 |
0.3478800 |
0.60879000 |
0 |
0.00 |
4.608790000 |
5 |
0.60% |
Louisiana |
9 |
4.5 |
0.0 |
0.2374868 |
0.41560190 |
2 |
3.50 |
8.415601900 |
9 |
1.08% |
Maine |
4 |
2.0 |
5.8 |
4.2946470 |
7.51563225 |
2 |
3.50 |
18.815632250 |
19 |
2.27% |
Maryland |
10 |
5.0 |
0.2 |
1.4248520 |
2.49349100 |
2 |
3.50 |
11.193491000 |
12 |
1.44% |
Mass. |
12 |
6.0 |
7.0 |
11.1428088 |
19.49991540 |
2 |
3.50 |
35.999915400 |
36 |
4.31% |
Michigan |
17 |
8.5 |
6.2 |
3.3303560 |
5.82812300 |
4 |
7.00 |
27.528123000 |
28 |
3.35% |
Minnesota |
10 |
5.0 |
7.6 |
6.5881920 |
11.52933600 |
2 |
3.50 |
27.629336000 |
28 |
3.35% |
Mississippi |
6 |
3.0 |
0.0 |
0.0666332 |
0.11660810 |
0 |
0.00 |
3.116608100 |
4 |
0.48% |
Missouri |
11 |
5.5 |
0.0 |
0.6277945 |
1.09864038 |
2 |
3.50 |
10.098640375 |
11 |
1.32% |
Montana |
3 |
1.5 |
1.0 |
2.0490015 |
3.58575263 |
0 |
0.00 |
6.085752625 |
7 |
0.84% |
Nebraska |
5 |
2.5 |
1.0 |
0.8638080 |
1.51166400 |
2 |
3.50 |
8.511664000 |
9 |
1.08% |
Nevada |
5 |
2.5 |
0.0 |
0.3691968 |
0.64609440 |
2 |
3.50 |
6.646094400 |
7 |
0.84% |
New Hamp. |
4 |
2.0 |
0.0 |
0.8657220 |
1.51501350 |
0 |
0.00 |
3.515013500 |
4 |
0.48% |
New Jersey |
15 |
7.5 |
0.4 |
2.8082538 |
4.91444415 |
2 |
3.50 |
16.314444150 |
17 |
2.03% |
New Mexico |
5 |
2.5 |
1.2 |
1.4555750 |
2.54725625 |
2 |
3.50 |
9.747256250 |
10 |
1.20% |
New York |
31 |
15.5 |
0.6 |
8.7362740 |
15.28847950 |
6 |
10.50 |
41.888479500 |
42 |
5.02% |
North Carolina |
15 |
7.5 |
1.0 |
0.4390800 |
0.76839000 |
2 |
3.50 |
12.768390000 |
13 |
1.56% |
North Dakota |
3 |
1.5 |
0.0 |
0.3120894 |
0.54615645 |
0 |
0.00 |
2.046156450 |
3 |
0.36% |
Ohio |
20 |
10.0 |
0.0 |
2.9464250 |
5.15624375 |
4 |
7.00 |
22.156243750 |
23 |
2.75% |
Oklahoma |
7 |
3.5 |
0.0 |
0.0000000 |
0.00000000 |
0 |
0.00 |
3.500000000 |
4 |
0.48% |
Oregon |
7 |
3.5 |
4.6 |
3.8987928 |
6.82288740 |
2 |
3.50 |
18.422887400 |
19 |
2.27% |
Pennsylvania |
21 |
10.5 |
13.2 |
2.1712320 |
3.79965600 |
5 |
8.75 |
36.249656000 |
37 |
4.43% |
Rhode Island |
4 |
2.0 |
1.0 |
1.5331824 |
2.68306920 |
2 |
3.50 |
9.183069200 |
10 |
1.20% |
South Carolina |
8 |
4.0 |
0.0 |
0.2949200 |
0.51611000 |
2 |
3.50 |
8.016110000 |
9 |
1.08% |
South Dakota |
3 |
1.5 |
0.0 |
0.0000000 |
0.00000000 |
0 |
0.00 |
1.500000000 |
2 |
0.24% |
Tennessee |
11 |
5.5 |
0.0 |
0.1879195 |
0.32885912 |
2 |
3.50 |
9.328859125 |
10 |
1.20% |
Texas |
34 |
17.0 |
1.0 |
2.9668710 |
5.19202425 |
8 |
14.00 |
37.192024250 |
38 |
4.55% |
Utah |
5 |
2.5 |
0.0 |
1.6670250 |
2.91729375 |
2 |
3.50 |
8.917293750 |
9 |
1.08% |
Vermont |
3 |
1.5 |
0.0 |
1.4098808 |
2.46729140 |
2 |
3.50 |
7.467291400 |
8 |
0.96% |
Virginia |
13 |
6.5 |
2.4 |
1.2889366 |
2.25563905 |
2 |
3.50 |
14.655639050 |
15 |
1.79% |
Washington |
11 |
5.5 |
5.2 |
4.2642828 |
7.46249490 |
2 |
3.50 |
21.662494900 |
22 |
2.63% |
West Virginia |
5 |
2.5 |
0.0 |
0.1762200 |
0.30838500 |
0 |
0.00 |
2.808385000 |
3 |
0.36% |
Wisconsin |
10 |
5.0 |
10.6 |
7.9318950 |
13.88081625 |
2 |
3.50 |
32.980816250 |
33 |
3.95% |
Wyoming |
3 |
1.5 |
1.0 |
0.0980500 |
0.17158750 |
0 |
0.00 |
2.671587500 |
3 |
0.36% |
Totals |
538 |
269.0 |
135.4 |
115.4491312 |
202.03597960 |
116 |
203.00 |
809.435979600 |
836 |
100.00% |
State |
Garnered
500 or more
votes |
Garnered
less than 500
votes or
switched Green |
Elected Greens |
|
E |
F |
E + (F × 0.2) |
Alabama |
|
|
0.0 |
Alaska |
|
|
0.0 |
Arizona |
|
|
0.0 |
Arkansas |
|
|
0.0 |
California |
49 |
21 |
53.2 |
Colorado |
3 |
8 |
4.6 |
Connecticut |
2 |
2 |
2.4 |
Delaware |
|
|
0.0 |
District of Columbia |
|
|
0.0 |
Florida |
2 |
1 |
2.2 |
Georgia |
|
|
0.0 |
Hawaii |
1 |
|
1.0 |
Idaho |
|
1 |
0.2 |
Illinois |
|
1 |
0.2 |
Indiana |
|
|
0.0 |
Iowa |
|
3 |
0.6 |
Kansas |
|
|
0.0 |
Kentucky |
|
|
0.0 |
Louisiana |
|
|
0.0 |
Maine |
5 |
4 |
5.8 |
Maryland |
|
1 |
0.2 |
Massachusetts |
4 |
15 |
7.0 |
Michigan |
6 |
1 |
6.2 |
Minnesota |
7 |
3 |
7.6 |
Mississippi |
|
|
0.0 |
Missouri |
|
|
0.0 |
Montana |
1 |
|
1.0 |
Nebraska |
1 |
|
1.0 |
Nevada |
|
|
0.0 |
New Hampshire |
|
|
0.0 |
New Jersey |
|
2 |
0.4 |
New Mexico |
1 |
1 |
1.2 |
New York |
|
3 |
0.6 |
North Carolina |
1 |
|
1.0 |
North Dakota |
|
|
0.0 |
Ohio |
|
|
0.0 |
Oklahoma |
|
|
0.0 |
Oregon |
4 |
3 |
4.6 |
Pennsylvania |
9 |
21 |
13.2 |
Rhode Island |
1 |
|
1.0 |
South Carolina |
|
|
0.0 |
South Dakota |
|
|
0.0 |
Tennessee |
|
|
0.0 |
Texas |
1 |
|
1.0 |
Utah |
|
|
0.0 |
Vermont |
|
|
0.0 |
Virginia |
2 |
2 |
2.4 |
Washington |
5 |
1 |
5.2 |
West Virginia |
|
|
0.0 |
Wisconsin |
8 |
13 |
10.6 |
Wyoming |
1 |
|
1.0 |
Totals |
114 |
107 |
135.4 |
------------------
State |
Vote |
Vote
Source |
Percentage
of Statewide
Vote |
Voting Strength |
|
G |
|
H |
(G × H) ÷ 100,000 |
Alabama |
18,349 |
Nader |
1.10% |
0.2018390 |
Alaska |
22,440 |
(2) |
8.18% |
1.8355920 |
Arizona |
45,645 |
Nader |
2.98% |
1.3602210 |
Arkansas |
13,421 |
Nader |
1.46% |
0.1959466 |
California |
418,707 |
Nader |
3.82% |
15.9946074 |
Colorado |
91,434 |
Nader |
5.25% |
4.8002850 |
Connecticut |
64,452 |
Nader |
4.42% |
2.8487784 |
Delaware |
13,860 |
(3) |
6.00% |
0.8316000 |
District of Columbia |
27,767 |
(4) |
11.00% |
3.0543700 |
Florida |
97,488 |
Nader |
1.63% |
1.5890544 |
Georgia |
13,432 |
Nader |
0.52% |
0.0698464 |
Hawaii |
21,623 |
Nader |
5.88% |
1.2714324 |
Idaho |
12,292 |
Nader |
2.45% |
0.3011540 |
Illinois |
103,759 |
Nader |
2.19% |
2.2723221 |
Indiana |
18,531 |
Nader |
0.84% |
0.1556604 |
Iowa |
29,374 |
Nader |
2.23% |
0.6550402 |
Kansas |
36,086 |
Nader |
3.37% |
1.2160982 |
Kentucky |
23,192 |
Nader |
1.50% |
0.3478800 |
Louisiana |
20,473 |
Nader |
1.16% |
0.2374868 |
Maine |
46,179 |
(6) |
9.30% |
4.2946470 |
Maryland |
53,768 |
Nader |
2.65% |
1.4248520 |
Massachusetts |
173,564 |
Nader |
6.42% |
11.1428088 |
Michigan |
109,192 |
(10) |
3.05% |
3.3303560 |
Minnesota |
126,696 |
Nader |
5.20% |
6.5881920 |
Mississippi |
8,126 |
Nader |
0.82% |
0.0666332 |
Missouri |
38,515 |
Nader |
1.63% |
0.6277945 |
Montana |
34,437 |
Nader |
5.95% |
2.0490015 |
Nebraska |
24,540 |
Nader |
3.52% |
0.8638080 |
Nevada |
15,008 |
Nader |
2.46% |
0.3691968 |
New Hampshire |
22,198 |
Nader |
3.90% |
0.8657220 |
New Jersey |
94,554 |
Nader |
2.97% |
2.8082538 |
New Mexico |
26,465 |
(5) |
5.50% |
1.4555750 |
New York |
244,030 |
Nader |
3.58% |
8.7362740 |
North Carolina |
36,590 |
(1) |
1.20% |
0.4390800 |
North Dakota |
9,486 |
Nader |
3.29% |
0.3120894 |
Ohio |
117,857 |
Nader |
2.50% |
2.9464250 |
Oklahoma |
0 |
Nader |
0.00% |
0.0000000 |
Oregon |
77,357 |
Nader |
5.04% |
3.8987928 |
Pennsylvania |
103,392 |
Nader |
2.10% |
2.1712320 |
Rhode Island |
25,052 |
Nader |
6.12% |
1.5331824 |
South Carolina |
20,200 |
Nader |
1.46% |
0.2949200 |
South Dakota |
0 |
Nader |
0.00% |
0.0000000 |
Tennessee |
19,781 |
Nader |
0.95% |
0.1879195 |
Texas |
137,994 |
Nader |
2.15% |
2.9668710 |
Utah |
35,850 |
Nader |
4.65% |
1.6670250 |
Vermont |
20,374 |
Nader |
6.92% |
1.4098808 |
Virginia |
59,398 |
Nader |
2.17% |
1.2889366 |
Washington |
103,002 |
Nader |
4.14% |
4.2642828 |
West Virginia |
10,680 |
Nader |
1.65% |
0.1762200 |
Wisconsin |
114,955 |
(9) |
6.90% |
7.9318950 |
Wyoming |
4,625 |
Nader |
2.12% |
0.0980500 |
Totals |
3,006,190 |
|
176.29% |
115.4491312 |
Vote Source Key:
Nader: Ralph Nader's 2000 race
for the Presidency.
(1): NC used local race as a percentage of total gubernatorial vote count
due to no Nader votes counted in 2000.
(2): Substituted Anna Young's 2000 race for US House of Representatives.
(3): Substituted Vivian Houghton's 2002 race for Attorney General.
(4): Substituted Arturio Griffith's 2000 race.
(5): Substituted David Bacon's 2002 race for Governor.
(6): Substituted Jonathan Carter's 2002 race for Governor.
(9): Substituted Paul Aschenbremer's 2002 race for State Treasurer.
(10): Substituted Scott Trudeau's 2000 race for Board of Regents.
The
calculation used to determine number of delegates allocated to each
state's Green Party delegation is as follows:
-
The
state's electoral vote × 0.5 (Column A)
-
Greens
elected 2000 through 2003 (Column B)
-
For each
elected Green
-
Award
0.2 points for each elected official who switched to the Green party after
taking office (included in Column F).
-
The
state's Green Party Voting Strength × 1.75 (Column C). For most
states, this criteria is based on the support Presidential contender
Ralph Nader received in the 2000 election. A state party may, however,
substitute another 2000-2003 statewide race that had both Democratic
and Republican opposition. To compute the electoral strength, multiply
the number of votes cast for the candidate (Column G) by the
percentage of the statewide vote the candidate received (Column H)
then ÷ by 100,000.
-
The
number of delegates that each state has on the Coordinating Committee
× 1.75 (Column D).
Total the
points from each of the four criteria and then round-up any
fractional part to the next largest whole number to determine the number
of delegates the state will send to the Green Party Convention.
We thank
Gray Newman of the Green Party for his assistance in compiling this data.
Source: http://www.thegreenpapers.com/T04/Gr-Alloc.phtml
|